The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nashik v. Agricultural Produce Marketcommittee, Jalgaon Roadjamner
High Court
27 Jul 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nashik v. Agricultural Produce Marketcommittee, Jalgaon Roadjamner
Date of order
27 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nashik v. Agricultural Produce Marketcommittee, Jalgaon Roadjamner, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
ca9945.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9945 OF 2016
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2015
The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Nashik
...Applicant
VERSUS
Agricultural Produce MarketCommittee, Jalgaon RoadJamner
...Respondent
.....
Shri Alok Sharma, A.S.G. for applicant
.....
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE AND P.R.BORA, JJ.
DATED: 27th JULY, 2016
PER COURT:-
Counsel appearing for the applicant has placed on record the copy of Circular No. 21 of 2015. Same is taken on record.
2.
For the reasons stated in the application,
application is allowed and stands disposed of accordingly.
3.
Income Tax Appeal No. 71 of 2015 is
restored to its original position.
(P.R.BORA,J.) (S.S.SHINDE,J.)dbm/ca9945.16
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue