The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2, Pune-411 037 v. M/S. Parwani Builders P. Ltd
High Court
19 Sep 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2, Pune-411 037 v. M/S. Parwani Builders P. Ltd
Date of order
19 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2, Pune-411 037 v. M/S. Parwani Builders P. Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: In view thereof, both the appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
suresh
9-ITXAG-484.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.484 OF 2015WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.412 OF 2015
The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2,Pune-411 037
Vs.M/s. Parwani Builders P. Ltd.
.... Appellant
.... Respondent
Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellant in ITXA-484/2015.Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant in ITXA-412/2015.Mr. Prayag Jha with Ms Chaitali K. i/by Navdeep Vora& Associates for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 19, 2017
P.C:
1.When these appeals were called out for admission in
the morning session, we were informed by Mr. Sham Walve and
Mr. Suresh Kumar, appearing for the Revenue in the respective appeals, that they have received oral instructions to withdraw the appeals because of low tax effect.
Page 1 of 2
suresh
9-ITXAG-484.2015.doc
2.Since we informed the learned Advocates that they must place written instructions on record, in the afternoon session, a copy of the fax message from the office of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune is filed which we take on record and mark “X” for identification. In view thereof, both the appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. There would be no order as to costs.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.