The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Pune v. M/S. Oriental Clearing Agencies
High Court
06 Sep 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Pune v. M/S. Oriental Clearing Agencies
Date of order
06 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Pune v. M/S. Oriental Clearing Agencies, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 886 OF 2018
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 2, PuneVersusM/s. Oriental Clearing Agencies
… Appellant
… Respondent
Mr. Ajeet Manwani for Appellant.
Mr. Sanket Bora a/w Ms. Vidhi Punmiya i/b SPCM Legal for Respondent.
CORAMK. R. SHRIRAM &DR. N. K. GOKHALE, JJ.DATED:6[th] September 2023
P.C. :
1.Mentioned out of turn.
2.Mr. Manwani places on record a letter dated 15[th] November
2022 received from the office of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax –
2, Pune.
3.Mr. Manwani states that as it is mentioned in the letter that
the tax effect involved in this case is below the monetary limit asper the CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8[th] August 2019 beingamendment to Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July 2018, heseeks leave to withdraw the Appeal.
4.Appeal therefore disposed as withdrawn.
(DR. N. K. GOKHALE, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue