The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Sadar, Nagpur v. Ashok Sundarlal Daga (Huf), Nagpur With

1 5 Income Tax Appeal No. 1-2018.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1/2018 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Sadar, Nagpur Vs. Ashok Sundarlal Daga (HUF), Nagpur WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.73/2018 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Nagpur Vs. M/s Gupta Domestic Fuels (Nagpur) Limited, NagpurWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.74/2018The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Nagpur Vs. M/s Gupta Domestic Fuels (Nagpur) Limited, NagpurWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.75/2018 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Nagpur Vs. M/s Gupta Domestic Fuels (Nagpur) Limited, NagpurWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77/2018 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Nagpur Vs. M/s Gupta Domestic Fuels (Nagpur) Limited, Nagpur …........................................................................................................................................Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................…...Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the appellant in all appeals. Shri K.P. Dewani, Advocate for respondent in all appeals. CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.DATED: 24[th ] January, 2020. It is not in dispute that the tax liability imposed inall these matters does not exceed Rs. 1,00,00,000/-(Rupees One Crore). As per the provisions under theCBDT Circular No. 17/19 dated 08.08.2019,suchappeals are required to be withdrawn by thedepartment. The department has already withdrawn JPP 2 5 Income Tax Appeal No. 1-2018.odt several such appeals pending before this Court.However, in these matters, the instructions have notbeen received by the learned counsel appearing for thedepartment. In view of the above, all these appeals aredisposed of as withdrawn in terms of the circularreferred to above and the appellant shall be at liberty toget the refund of court fees, if permissible, inaccordance with law. We make it clear that, if in any case, it is foundthat the liability is above rupees one crore, it shall beopen for the appellant to move this Court for restorationof such appeals. JUDGE JUDGE