In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2…Applicant v. Infinity Retail Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sharayu Khot.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1818 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 720 OF 2017
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2…Applicant/ Appellant
Versus
Infinity Retail Ltd.
…Respondent
----------
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Applicant/Appellant.
----------
CORAM :M.S. SANKLECHA &RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 19 January 2018
ORDER :
1.None appears on behalf of the Respondent, despiteservice.
1/2
6-NMA-1818-17.doc
2.This Motion has been taken out for condonation of16 days delay in filing an accompanying Appeal against orderdated 10 August 2016 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal.
3.We have perused the Affidavit dated 5 October 2017
of Ms. Sujata Verma the Assistant Commissioner of Income Taxin support of the Motion and are satisfied with the reasonsindicated therein for the delay.
4.In the above view, the Notice of Motion is allowed interms of prayer clause (a).
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue