Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sh...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Vinod Jagannath Chandsarkar(Deceased) Thr. Lrs.seema

High Court 10 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

10 Jul 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Vinod Jagannath Chandsarkar(Deceased) Thr. Lrs.seema, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(1) 6179.18ca IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABADCIVIL APPLICATION NO.6179 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.102 OF 2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2,Kendriya Rajeshwa Bhavan,Gadkari Chowk, Old Agra Road,Nashik-2 ..APPLICANT VERSUS Shri Vinod Jagannath Chandsarkar(deceased) thr. Lrs.Seema w/o Vinod Chandsarkar,Unity Ply “Pitru-Chhaya”,Nehru Chowk, Navi Peth,Jalgoan-425001 ..RESPONDENT Mr Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for applicant CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALEANDS. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 10th July, 2018 ORAL ORDER: Heard Mr Sharma, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of theapplicant-appellant. 2.For the reasons stated in the application, prayer for bringing legalrepresentative of deceased respondent, is allowed. 3.Issue notice to legal heir of the respondent, returnable on 31[st] July,2018, on the address mentioned in paragraph No.5 of the application. (S. M. GAVHANE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.