The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr Alok M. Sharma, Advocate For
High Court
10 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr Alok M. Sharma, Advocate For
Date of order
10 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr Alok M. Sharma, Advocate For, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6178 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.106 OF 2016
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2,Kendriya Rajeshwa Bhavan,Gadkari Chowk, Old Agra Road,Nashik-2
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
Smt. Shakuntala Sureshchandra Sanghavideceased thr. Lrs.Deepak S. Sanghavi,Near National Highway No.6,M.J. College, Jalgaon
..RESPONDENT
Mr Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for applicant
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALEANDS. M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATE : 10th July, 2018
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Mr Sharma, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of theapplicant-appellant.
2.For the reasons stated in the application, prayer for bringing legalrepresentative of deceased respondent, is allowed.
3.Issue notice to legal heir of the respondent, returnable on 31[st] July,2018, on the address mentioned in paragraph No.5 of the application.
(S. M. GAVHANE, J.)
(PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue