The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2,Pune v. M/S. B.u. Bhandari Raviraj Developers,Pune…
High Court
01 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2,Pune v. M/S. B.u. Bhandari Raviraj Developers,Pune…
Date of order
01 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2,Pune v. M/S. B.u. Bhandari Raviraj Developers,Pune…, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.404 OF 2015
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 2,Pune
… Appellant
Vs.
M/s. B.U. Bhandari Raviraj Developers,Pune… Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
1[st ] NOVEMBER, 2017
DATE :
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant – Revenue. He fairly pointed out a decision of the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax - 19 Vs. Sarkar Builders[1] .
2We have perused the said decision. The questions of law which are sought to be pressed which are stated in paragraph 5 are no more res integra and have been answered by the Apex Court against the appellant. Hence, no substantial questions of law arises. Appeal is dismissed.
(A.K. MENON, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
1.[2015] 57 taxman.com 313 (SC)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue