Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Lu...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Ludhiana v. M/S R.b. Knit Exports

High Court 27 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

27 Nov 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Ludhiana v. M/S R.b. Knit Exports, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.Consequently, this appeal is dismissed in the same terms asCWP No.8023 of 2007.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

YOGESH SHARMA2019.11.29 15:32I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document 111IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA-261-2019 (O&M)Date of decision : 27.11.2019 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Ludhiana Versus M/s R.B. Knit Exports ... Appellant ... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present:Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel withMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Junior Standing Counsel,for the appellant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue has very fairlyconceded that the present appeal is covered by the decision of this Court rendered inITA No.238 of 2018 titled as “The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Ludhiana V/s R.B. Knit Export, Ludhiana”, decided25.03.2019. 2.Consequently, this appeal is dismissed in the same terms asCWP No.8023 of 2007. 3.Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE 27.11.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE Yes/ NoYes/ No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.