Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v. Du Securities Pvt. Ltd. Through: None

High Court 24 Jul 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

24 Jul 2019

Assessment year(s)

2008-09

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v. Du Securities Pvt. Ltd. Through: None, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Ltd.) pertaining to the Assessment Years (AYs) 2007-08, 2009-10, 2005-06 and 2006-07, respectively, the present appeal which pertains to the AY 2008-09 is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 688/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate with Mr. Tapendra Sankhla, Advocate versus DU SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % O R D E R24.07.2019 In view of the common order dated 23[rd] July, 2019 passed by this Court in ITA No. 680/2019, 681/2019, 683/2019 and 685/2019–(The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 3 v. DU Securities Pvt. Ltd.) pertaining to the Assessment Years (AYs) 2007-08, 2009-10, 2005-06 and 2006-07, respectively, the present appeal which pertains to the AY 2008-09 is dismissed. Court in ITA No. 680/2019, 681/2019, 683/2019 and 685/2019 S. MURALIDHAR, J. JULY 24, 2019 PB TALWANT SINGH, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.