Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v. Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd. Through None

High Court 19 Jul 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v. Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd. Through None
Date of order
19 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v. Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd. Through None, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 665/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing counsel versus FLUOR DANIEL INDIA PVT. LTD. Through None ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % O R D E R19.07.2019 1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against an order dated 17[th] January, 2019 passed by the ITAT in ITA No. 973/Del/2016 for the Assessment Year 2011-2012. 2. The issue sought to be urged by the Revenue concerns the exclusion of four comparables by the ITAT and inclusion of one as suggested by the Assessee. 3. The Court notes that the ITAT has given detailed reasons in support of its conclusions by discussing each of the comparables from the point of view of the functionality assets and risk test in terms of Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules. 4. The Court is unable to find any legal infirmity in the impugned order which gives rise to any the substantial question of law that requires determination. 5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J. JULY 19, 2019 mw TALWANT SINGH, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan