The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. Galgotia Software Pvt. Ltd
High Court
14 Sep 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. Galgotia Software Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
14 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. Galgotia Software Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of, without examining the issue/question raised.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 1002/2018 & CM Nos.37590-91/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus
GALGOTIA SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Through
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R
%
14.09.2018
Learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue states that the tax effect involved in this appeal is below Rs.50,00,000/- and hence, in terms of circular No.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018, the appeal may be disposed of, without answering the issue/question raised. It may be clarified that the issue/question raised has been left open.
Recording the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of, without examining the issue/question raised. We also clarify that the issue/question is left open. We also grant liberty to the Revenue to file an application for revival of the present appeal, if it is found that the case is covered by an exception.
In the aforesaid circumstances, we are not issuing notice on the applications for condonation of delay in filing and re-filing the appeal. These applications will be considered, in case application for revival is filed. For present, all applications will be treated as disposed of.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
SEPTEMBER 14, 2018/tp
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.