Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. Ge India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. Through: None

High Court 05 Dec 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

05 Dec 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. Ge India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. Through: None, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1114/2017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT. LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % O R D E R05.12.2017 The question of law sought to be urged in this appeal is with respect to the extension of the interim order by the ITAT beyond 365 days. The ITAT has held in favour of the assessee in view of the judgment in Pepsi Food Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT 2015 (376) ITR 87 (Del.). ITA 1114/2017 is accordingly dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J DECEMBER 05, 2017 /vikas/ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.