The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Ge Money Financial Services Pvt. Ltd
High Court
01 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Ge Money Financial Services Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
01 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Ge Money Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
8
+ ITA 120/2017
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4..... Appellant Through:Mr Puneet Rai and Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate
versus
GE MONEY FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD...... Respondent Through: Mr Sachit Jolly, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R
%
01.05.2017
1. It is stated that the issue raised by the Revenue in the present appeal which is directed against the order dated order dated 8[th] July, 2016, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench I New Delhi (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 440/Del/2014 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2009-10 stands covered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue by order dated 8[th]February, 2017 passed by this Court in ITA Nos. 67/2017, 68/2017 and 73/2017, The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v GE Money Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. for the AYs 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09.
2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 01, 2017 rd
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue