The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Gomati Consultants Pvt. Ltd
High Court
28 Apr 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Gomati Consultants Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
28 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Gomati Consultants Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
1. + ITA 251/2017
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
GOMATI CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
..... Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
%
O R D E R28.04.2017
1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) is against an order dated 4[th] July, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 4594/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2008-09.
2. The question sought to be urged is whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘CIT (A)’] erred in deleting the addition of Rs.67 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) on account of share application money received by the Assessee under Section 68 of the Act. The ITAT has affirmed the order of the CIT (A).
3. Having heard learned counsel for the Appellant and having perused the concurrent orders of CIT (A) and ITAT, the Court is of the view that the findings have turned purely on facts and no substantial question of law
ITA No. 251 of 2017
Page 1 of 2
arises for consideration.
4. The appeal is dismissed.
APRIL 28, 2017 dn
ITA No. 251 of 2017
S. MURALIDHAR, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.