The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. Gvk Project & Technical Services Ltd
High Court
28 May 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. Gvk Project & Technical Services Ltd
Date of order
28 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. Gvk Project & Technical Services Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, no substantial question of law arises; the appeal is therefore dismissed along with the pending application.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 646/2018 & CM APPL. 22629/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus GVK PROJECT & TECHNICAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani and Mr. Upkar Agrawal, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R
%
28.05.2018
The Revenue’s appeal is with respect to the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) under Section 14-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act’). The AO had proceeded to calculate the disallowance based upon the investments made by the assessee. The CIT(A) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee’s appeals by following the ruling in ‘Cheminvest Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-VI’, (2015) 378 ITR 33; the Court had then held that in the absence of any exempt income disallowance was impermissible. For the relevant Assessment Year (2013-14), concededly, the assessee did not report any exempt income. Consequently, no substantial question of law arises; the appeal is therefore dismissed along with the pending application.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
MAY 28, 2018/nn
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.