The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Halcrow Consulting India Pvt. Ltd
High Court
17 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Halcrow Consulting India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Halcrow Consulting India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The appeals are, consequently, dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~91 to 100
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 720/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs
versus
HALCROW CONSULTING INDIA PVT. LTD......Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor and Mr. Utkarsha Kumar Gupta, Advs. Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor and Mr. Utkarsha Kumar Gupta, Advs.
92
+ ITA 754/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4.....Appellant Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC with Mr. Anmol Jagga, Adv.
versus
GOODYEAR INDIA LIMITED
.....Respondent Mr. Neeraj Jain, Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal and Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal and Mr. Abhisek Singhvi, Advs.
Through:
93
+ ITA 762/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI - 2
.....Appellant
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
SH. PRADEEP KHANNA
Through:
.....Respondent Appearance not given.
94
+ ITA 780/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4.....Appellant Through: Mr. Debesh Panda, Standing Counsel with Ms. Zehra Khan and Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Advs. Through: Mr. Debesh Panda, Standing Counsel with Ms. Zehra Khan and Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Advs.
versus
INDO RAMA SYSTHETIC INDIA LTD.
.....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.
95
+ ITA 808/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5.....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC. Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC.
versus
JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT.LTD......Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Mangal and Ms. Radhika Sharma, Advs. Through: Mr. Sumit Mangal and Ms. Radhika Sharma, Advs.
96
+ ITA 814/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5.....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC. Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC.
versus
JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT.LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Mangal and Ms. Radhika Sharma, Advs. Through: Mr. Sumit Mangal and Ms. Radhika Sharma, Advs.
97
+ ITA 826/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5.....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC.
versus
JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT.LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Mangal and Ms. Radhika Sharma, Advs.
98
+ ITA 833/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5.....Appellant Through: Appearance not given.
versus
KARMIC BUSINESS SPECIALITIES PVT. LTD.
.....Respondent
Through: Appearance not given.
99
+ ITA 850/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5
.....Appellant
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
BYCELL TELECOMMUNICATION
.....Respondent
Through:
Appearance not given.
100
+ ITA 866/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2.....Appellant
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
MALA KALSI, .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R
17.12.2024
1.Undisputedly, the tax effect which forms the subject matter of these appeals falls below INR 2 Crores and would thus not be liable to be continued in light of the provisions made in Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17 September 2024.
2.The appeals are, consequently, dismissed on the ground of low tax effect. The proposed questions of law are kept open to be urged and addressed in an appropriate case.
YASHWANT VARMA, J
DECEMBER 17, 2024/RW
DHARMESH SHARMA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.