Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. M/S Hcl Technologies Ltd

High Court 20 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

20 Feb 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 v. M/S Hcl Technologies Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 254 case law →

$~35 to 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 214/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 ..... Appellant versus M/S HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ..... Respondent + ITA 215/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 ..... Appellant versus M/S HCL TECHONOLOGIES LTD. ..... Respondent + ITA 216/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 ..... Appellant versus M/S HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ..... Respondent Present: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. Ms. Devika Jain, Adv. for respondent. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 20.02.2018 The Revenue is aggrieved by the order of the ITAT extending the stay, and it contends that this is contrary to the provisions of Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue is covered against the Revenue in this respect by the ITA 214/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 judgment of this Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT 376 ITR 87. No question of law arises. The appeals are dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J FEBRUARY 20, 2018 kks A. K. CHAWLA, J ITA 214/2018 & connected matters

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.