Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Mantec Consultants Pvt. Ltd

High Court 11 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Mantec Consultants Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
11 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Mantec Consultants Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The second question is whether the donation of `1 lakh for the institution of an annual award could legitimately be claimed as CSR on this.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 559/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6..... Appellant Through : Sh. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel.versusMANTEC CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 11.05.2018 % In this appeal, two questions of law are urged under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereafter “the 1961 Act”]. The first one is with respect to disallowance under Section 40a(ia) of the 1961 Act on the ground of failure to deduct tax on the amount paid to one Sh. I.S. Brara. According to the Revenue, the amount was towards Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Explanation 7 to Section 7(1) of the 1961 Act. On this issue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for a previous year, followed its own ruling, which was concurred by this Court in ITA 521/2016 [Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mantec Consultants Pvt. Ltd.]. The Court had then declined to frame a substantial question of law by following a previous ruling in CIT v. Angelique International Limited 219 Taxmann 104. For the same reasons, no substantial question of law arises. The second question is whether the donation of `1 lakh for the institution of an annual award could legitimately be claimed as CSR on this. The findings of the lower appellate authority are concurrent and against the Revenue. No question of law arises. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MAY 11, 2018/ajk A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan