Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd

High Court 02 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

02 Mar 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal and the pending application are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 995/2019 & CM APPL. 53613/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 ..... AppellantThrough:Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Senior StandingCounsel with Mr.Shlok Chandra andMs.Madhura M.N., Advocates. versus MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. ..... RespondentThrough:Ms.Kavita Jha and Ms.Devika Jain, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R%02.03.2020 1. This Court notices that the question of law urged, i.e. the Tribunal’spower to extend the period of stay beyond 365 days period has beenexplained and read down by this Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT376 ITR 87. In these circumstances, the question of law urged does notarise. At the same time, the Tribunal is directed to expedite the hearing anddeliver its final verdict with utmost despatch. 2. The appeal and the pending application are dismissed. VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 02, 2020 v SANJEEV NARULA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.