The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. M.b. Finmart Pvt. Ltd. Through
High Court
08 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. M.b. Finmart Pvt. Ltd. Through
Date of order
08 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. M.b. Finmart Pvt. Ltd. Through, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The short question sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the income of Rs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~10
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 836/2016
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate
versus
M.B. FINMART PVT. LTD. Through
..... Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA O R D E R% 08.05.2017
1. This is an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („Act‟) against the order dated 9[th] June, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal („ITAT‟) in ITA No. 1145/Del/2014 for the Assessment Year („AY‟) 2010-11.
2. The short question sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the income of Rs. 55,80,788/- and Rs. 1,59,15,398/- from trading in shares/mutual funds should be treated as business income or capital gains?
3. The Court finds that the concurrent findings of both the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) and the ITAT are that the consistent treatment of the said transactions in the books of accounts of the Assessee and the volume and frequency of such transactions did not justify treating the income as business income. In particular, the ITAT has noted in para 9 as under:
“9. From the details of purchase and sale and period of holding of shares, it is observed that the assessee has held 11 transactions of shares for more than 50 days and the balance were held for more than 100 days in total number of 30 transactions. In the previous year and the subsequent years relevant to the Assessment Year under consideration the Department has been consistently accepting the investment in shares held by the assessee.During the year under consideration, the assessee has sold shares of two companies being Hindustan Construction and GMR Infra Structure. The remaining shares relate to purchases made in the previous years.”
4. In the circumstances, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is not persuaded to hold to the above concurrent findings suffer from any perversity. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 08, 2017 tp
ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.