The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Mmtc Ltd
High Court
28 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Mmtc Ltd
Date of order
28 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Mmtc Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 1071/2017
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia with Mr. Puneet Rai & Mr. Gaurav Khetarpal, Advs.
versus
MMTC LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Kavita Jha with
Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
%
O R D E R
28.11.2017
1. The Revenue is in appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with respect to the disallowance under –Section 14A made by the AO in the sum of `3,45,20,401/-. The AO had applied Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1982.
2. This Court notices that the judgment in Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Mumbai v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 328 ITR 81 (Bom) and that of this Court in SIL Investment Ltd. v. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax 148 TTJ 213 (Del) was applied. Furthermore, for another assessment
year concerning the same assessee (MMTC Ltd.), this Court had declined framing question of law on the issue of Section 14A, as in the present case; Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. MMTC Ltd. (ITA No.730/2017 decided on 12.09.2017).
3. As a consequence, no question of law arises. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
NOVEMBER 28, 2017 kks
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.