Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Modern Prefab Systems Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Modern Prefab Systems Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Modern Prefab Systems Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 64/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus MODERN PREFAB SYSTEMS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 22.01.2018 The assessee’s claim for allowing net expenditure, was doubted by the AO in this case which led to the disallowance to the tune of `1.05 crores. The assessee had claimed that it spent such amount towards transportation charges. The only differential amount of `3,00,731/- was shown as the net expenditure since the total expenditure incurred towards receipts of transportation was set off against other expenses. The CIT(A) considered the materials afresh and held that the AO had unnecessarily doubted the expenditure and refused to permit the netting. The ITAT affirmed the view of the CIT(A). Being entirely factual, the Court is of the opinion that no question of law arises. The appeal is therefore dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J JANUARY 22, 2018 kks A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan