Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Nec Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Through

High Court 17 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Nec Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Through
Date of order
17 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Nec Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Through, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 881/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus NEC TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. Through ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 17.08.2018 The impugned order records that the departmental representatives appearing for the Revenue had on last two occasions asked for adjournments, when the matter was listed for hearing. In these circumstances, we do not appreciate and understand why the Revenue has filed the present appeal, questioning the order passed by the Tribunal extending the stay. Perhaps, Tribunal should not have granted adjournment and heard ex parte arguments. Revenue cannot be allowed to challenge extension of stay, when they are at fault and to be blamed. We are also doubtful that an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is maintainable. The appeal is dismissed. SANJIV KHANNA, J AUGUST 17, 2018/tp CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan