The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Versus
High Court
03 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Versus
Date of order
03 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 v. Versus, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal and the pending application are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 162/2020
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. versus versus
MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Devika Jain, Adv.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R
03.03.2020
This Court notices that the question of law urged, i.e. the Tribunal’s
power to extend the period of stay beyond 365 days period has been explained and read down by this Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 376 ITR 87.In these circumstances, the question of law urged does not arise. At the same time, the Tribunal is directed to expedite the hearing and deliver its final verdict with utmost despatch.
The appeal and the pending application are dismissed.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue