Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Techbooks Electronics Services Pvt. Ltd

High Court 20 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Techbooks Electronics Services Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
20 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Techbooks Electronics Services Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the aforesaid, the appeal shall stand disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1062/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC with Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Parth Semwal, Advs. versus TECHBOOKS ELECTRONICS SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S. Vasudevan, Mr. Devashish Jain, Mr. Karanjot Singh, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 20.03.2024 1.Upon hearing learned counsels for parties, we had on 31 January 2023 passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the respondent has placed for our consideration a chart from which it is sought to be pointed out that even if the mean margin as worked out from the comparables were to be excluded from consideration, the same would work to 2.62% whereas the 'Transfer Pricing Officer in the order of 24 June 2019 has factored the mean margin at 8.65%. Let a copy of the said chart be included on our digital record. Let Mr. Maratha, learned counsel representing the appellant, obtain instructions in the aforesaid light.” 2.The aforesaid was observed by us bearing in mind the chart which had been placed for our consideration by learned counsel appearing for the respondent assessee as also an order of the Transfer Pricing Officer dated 24 June 2019 which had accepted the mean margin computation at the rate of 8.65%. 3.Mr. Maratha, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the aforesaid stand has been duly accepted and consequently there would be no adverse tax impact. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal shall stand disposed of. YASHWANT VARMA, J. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.MARCH 20, 2024/neha
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan