The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-1 v. Amolak Singh Bhatia
High Court
10 May 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-1 v. Amolak Singh Bhatia
Date of order
10 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-1 v. Amolak Singh Bhatia, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~82, 83 & 95
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 272/2024
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL-1
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC.
Versus
AMOLAK SINGH BHATIA
..... Respondent
Through: None.
83
+ ITA 273/2024
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL-1 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC.
Versus
AMOLAK SINGH BHATIA
Through: None.
..... Respondent
95
+ ITA 275/2024
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -
1
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC.
Versus
AMOLAK SINGH BHATIA
Through:
None.
..... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
%
O R D E R10.05.2024
CM APPL 28039/2024 (Exemption) in ITA 272/2024CM APPL 28065/2024 (Exemption) in ITA 275/2024
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed of.
ITA 272/2024 & CM APPLs. 28038/2024 (delay in filing) & -28040/2024 (delay in refiling)
ITA 273/2024 & CM APPLs. 28045/2024 (delay in filing) & -28046/2024 (delay in refiling)
ITA 275/2024 & CM APPLs. 28064/2024 (delay in filing) & -28066/2024 (delay in refiling)
1.Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel appearing for the appellant prays for liberty to withdraw the instant appeals subject to rights being reserved to approach the Chhattisgarh High Court.
2.Ordered accordingly.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MAY 10, 2024 p’ma
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.