Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Centr...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central -1 v. M/S Creamy Foods Ltd. Through

High Court 02 Sep 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central -1 v. M/S Creamy Foods Ltd. Through
Date of order
02 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central -1 v. M/S Creamy Foods Ltd. Through, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 21,84,557/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~48. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 791/2019 ––THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus CENTRAL -1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus M/S CREAMY FOODS LTD. Through: Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R02.09.2019 % C.M. No. 39090/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. ITA 791/2019 In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect of tax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department could pursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the tax effect in the present case is Rs. 21,84,557/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed. VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 02, 2019/kd SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan