Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Centr...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 v. Baba Global Ltd

High Court 26 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 v. Baba Global Ltd
Date of order
26 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 v. Baba Global Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 769/2017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Gaurav Khetrapal, Advocate. Versus BABA GLOBAL LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ved Jain, Advocate with Mr.Pranjal Srivastava, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R26.09.2017 % 1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against an order dated 28[th] December, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No.1085/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2005-06. 2. The questions urged by the Revenue read as under:- “2.1 Whether the ITAT was right in law in setting aside assessment made under Section 153A of the Act consequent to search under Section 132 of the Act? 2.2 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT erred in law and on facts in adopting a restrictive and pedantic interpretation of the scope of assessment under Section 153 read with Section 153C of the Act? 2.3 Whether Ld. ITAT erred in not deciding the issue on merits?” 3. The aforementioned questions stand answered against the Revenue by the order dated 14[th] December, 2016 in ITA Nos. 821, 822/2016 and order dated 23[rd]December, 2016 in ITA 938/2016 which are Revenue’s appeals in cases involving the same Assessee. 4. In that view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises for consideration. 5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 ‘anb’ PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan