The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Gateway Impex Pvt. Ltd
High Court
11 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Gateway Impex Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
11 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Gateway Impex Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: These appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~93, 94 & 97
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 137/2019 & CM Nos. 6351-52/2019
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL-3
..... Appellant
versus
GATEWAY IMPEX PVT. LTD.
..... Respondent
+ ITA 138/2019 & CM APPL. 6353/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant
versus
GATEWAY IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
+ ITA 141/2019 & CM Nos. 6356-57/2019
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant
versus
GATEWAY IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Present : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Adv. for respondent.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
%
O R D E R11.02.2019
The entire question of law urged in this case is with respect to the additions made in Section 153C by the Assessment Officer (AO) pursuant to a search carried out in the premises of a third party. In the block assessment, the AO brought to tax the amounts under Section 14A. The Tribunal held correctly that since no material was seized by or recovered, which incriminated the assessee, the addition made under Section 14A was not sustainable; in doing so, the Tribunal relied upon Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kabul Chawla, 380 ITR 573. No substantial question of law arises in the present appeals.
These appeals are dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2019 aj
PRATEEK JALAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.