The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 v. Jaypee Commodities Ltd
High Court
26 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 v. Jaypee Commodities Ltd
Date of order
26 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 v. Jaypee Commodities Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 770/2017
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Gaurav Khetrapal, Advocate.
Versus
JAYPEE COMMODITIES LTD.
..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ved Jain, Advocate with Mr.Pranjal Srivastava, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R26.09.2017
%
1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against an order dated 10[th] January, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No.4090/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2010-11.
2. The question urged by the Revenue reads as under:-
“2.1 Whether Ld. ITAT/CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs.30,60,000/- made by the Assessing officer on account of disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act,1961 read with Rule 8D?”
3. Learned counsel for the Assessee raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the present appeal on account of low tax efect. However, the Court finds that on merits the question urged stands covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in Cheminvest Ltd. Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax (2015) 378 ITR 33.
4. In that view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 ‘anb’
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.