Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Cent...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Ravinder Taneja

High Court 03 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Ravinder Taneja
Date of order
03 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Ravinder Taneja, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: Recording the said statement, the appeal is disposed of without answering the question of law which is left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* + $~1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIITA 418/2018 & CM No. 13879/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus RAVINDER TANEJA ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Madhur Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 03.08.2018 Counsel for the appellant-Revenue states that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50,00,000/- and hence the question of law raised in the present appeal need not be answered in terms of Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018. Recording the said statement, the appeal is disposed of without answering the question of law which is left open. In these circumstances, we are not deciding the application seeking condonation of delay. SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J AUGUST 03, 2018 SR
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan