Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Cent...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Sanjeev Dhingra

High Court 29 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

29 Aug 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Sanjeev Dhingra, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: Recording the said statement, the appeals are disposed of, withoutdeciding the issue raised, which is left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Signed By:RAM DATTSigning Date:09.10.2024 15:41Certify that the digital and physical file havebeen compared and the digital data is as perthe physical file and no page is missing. $-27 to 29 & 31. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +ITA No. 943/2018 & CM Nos. 34960-34961/2018ITANp. 944/2018 & CM Nos. 34962-34963/2018ITANp. 944/2018 & CM Nos. 34962-34963/2018 ITA No. 945/2018 & CM Nos. 34964-34965/2018 ITA No. 947/2018 & CM Nos. 34968-34969/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL-3 Appellant Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate, versus SANJEEV DHINGRA Respondent Through Nemo. % CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHARORDER29.08.2018 Counsel for the appellant-Revenue states that the tax effect in thepresent appeals is below Rs.50 lacs in each year and, hence, in terms ofCircular No. 3/2018 dated ll''^ July, 2018, the appeals may be disposed of,without deciding the question of law, which may be kept open. Recording the said statement, the appeals are disposed of, withoutdeciding the issue raised, which is left open. AUGUST 29, 2018 VKR ^A SANJIV KHANNA, J. CHAND^^IEKHAR, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.