Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Centr...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 v. Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd

High Court 12 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

12 Dec 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 v. Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 84,97,886/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~60. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 987/2017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Advocate. versus SUNCITY PROJECTS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain and Mr. Kislaya Parashar, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % O R D E R 12.12.2019 In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect of tax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department could pursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the tax effect in the present case is Rs. 84,97,886/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed. VIPIN SANGHI, J DECEMBER 12, 2019 kd REKHA PALLI, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.