Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cent...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Genex Industries Ltd., Ludhiana

High Court 15 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

15 Jan 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Genex Industries Ltd., Ludhiana, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether speaking/ reasoneda.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

108-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH y+. ITA No.217 of 2019 (O&M)Date of Decision: 15.01.2020 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana Versus Appellant M/s Genex Industries Ltd., Ludhiana Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present:Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel andMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counselfor the appellant.Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counselfor the appellant. )))) AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. For detailed and reasoned order, see order of even date passed in ITA No.214 of 2019 titled asThe Pr. Comissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana Vs. M/s Genex Industries Ltd. JUDGE JUDGE January 15, 2020 pankaj baweja I. Whether speaking/ reasoneda. Whether reportable Yes/NoYes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.