The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Kangaro Industries Limited
High Court
21 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Kangaro Industries Limited
Date of order
21 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Ludhiana v. M/S Kangaro Industries Limited, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision : 21[st] April, 2022
ITA No.213 of 2019 (O&M)
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ludhiana
….Appellant
Versus
M/s Kangaro Industries Limited
…..Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSAHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocate for the appellant.
PANKAJ JAIN, J.
Appeal dismissed.
For details, see order of even date i.e. 21[st] April, 2022 passed in
ITA No.205 of 2019 titled as 'The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Central) Ludhiana vs. M/s Kanin (India)'.
(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)
JUDGE
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
April 21, 2022
Dpr
Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/NoWhether reportable:Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.