The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. M/S. Urja Infrastructure, Mumbai
High Court
25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. M/S. Urja Infrastructure, Mumbai
Date of order
25 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. M/S. Urja Infrastructure, Mumbai, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2015
(The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur vs. M/s. Urja Infrastructure, Mumbai)
_____________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directionsand Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. JANUARY 25, 2016.
Heard Shri Bhattad, learned counsel for theappellant – revenue and Shri Dewani, learned counsel forthe respondent – assessee.
The relevant Assessment Year is 2009-10 and thetax effect is Rs.15,15,909/- only. As such, in the light ofC.B.D.T. Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015, appealis disposed of as withdrawn. The Registry to refundproportionate court fee to the appellant.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue