Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Cent...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central v. Amolak Singh Bhatia

High Court 15 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

15 May 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central v. Amolak Singh Bhatia, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~75 & 76 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 288/2024 & CM APPLs. 29135-37/2024 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC alongwith Mr. Anant Mann, Jr. SC. Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC alongwith Mr. Anant Mann, Jr. SC. versus AMOLAK SINGH BHATIA ..... Respondent Through: None. 76 + ITA 289/2024 & CM APPLs. 29140-42/2024 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC alongwith Mr. Anant Mann, Jr. SC. versus AMOLAK SINGH BHATIA ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R 15.05.2024 % Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel appearing for the appellant prays for liberty to withdraw the instant appeals subject to rights being reserved to approach the Chhattisgarh High Court. Ordered accordingly. YASHWANT VARMA, J. MAY 15, 2024/p’ma PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.