Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Cent...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central v. Pepisco India Holding Pvt. Ltd

High Court 16 May 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central v. Pepisco India Holding Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
16 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central v. Pepisco India Holding Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~72 to 85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 682/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPISCO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 73 + ITA 690/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. Through: versus PEPISCO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 74 + ITA 697/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. 75 + Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. ITA 698/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 76 + ITA 705/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 77 + ITA 706/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. Through: versus PEPSI FOODS PVT. LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS - M/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD.) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 78 + ITA 715/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 79 + ITA 718/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 80 + ITA 723/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. Through: versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 81 + ITA 752/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 82 + ITA 152/2023 THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 83+ ITA 342/2023 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Agarwal, Sr.SC with Mr. Shivansh B. Pandya and Mr. Viplav Acharya, Jr.SCs along with Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 84 + ITA 184/2023 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 83+ ITA 342/2023 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Agarwal, Sr.SC with Mr. Shivansh B. Pandya and Mr. Viplav Acharya, Jr.SCs along with Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 84 + ITA 184/2023 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr.SC. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. 85 + ITA 496/2023 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-7 ..... Appellant Through: Appearance not given. versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Anmol Anand, Mrs. Priya Tandon and Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advs. % CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R16.05.2024 1.We had in terms of our order of 01 April 2024 decided all the principal questions and had left it open for learned counsels to address submissions on the question of Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion [“AMP”]. 2.However and upon going through the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and insofar as it deals with the aforesaid issue, we find that the AMP computation was based on the adoption of the Bright Line Test. That would clearly not sustain in light of the judgement rendered by the Court in Sony Ericson v. CIT [2015 SCC OnLine Del 8083]. 3.In view of the aforesaid, we find no merit in these appeals. The same shall stand dismissed. YASHWANT VARMA, J. MAY 16, 2024/p PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan