The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd
High Court
16 Dec 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd
Date of order
16 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. M/S Jindal Steel And Power Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3 |For the reasons recorded in the aforementioned appeal, thepresent appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
117IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
ITA-376-2019(0&M)Date of decision :16.12.2019
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon,
Versus
...... Appellant:
M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEK AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK PURI
Present :Mr. Tajender Joshi, Senior Standing Counsel with|Mr. Vikram Bali, Junior Standing Counselfor the appellant,
111
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
inThe present appeal has been filed under Section 260A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’), against the order dated11.01.2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘J-2'New Delhi, in stay application No. 865/DEL/2018 (in ITA No,6674/DEL/2017) tor the assessment year 2012-2013.
2 |It was not disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue that the matter in issue is no longer res integra and standsconcluded by the decision of this Court in ITA No.5 of 2016, titled as “Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon Vs. M/s Carrier Air Conditioningand Refigeration Ltd.”, decided on 25.04.2016, whereby, identical questionas Claimed in the present appeal, has been held not to be substantial questionof law.
3 |For the reasons recorded in the aforementioned appeal, thepresent appeal is dismissed.
ITA-376-2019(0&M)
4Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending Civil Misc,Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARIT)JUDGE
16.12.2019Janki
(VIVEK PURI)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable :
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.