The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Gurgaon v. M/S. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., Delhi Road, Hisar
High Court
06 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Gurgaon v. M/S. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., Delhi Road, Hisar
Date of order
06 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Gurgaon v. M/S. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., Delhi Road, Hisar, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons recorded in the aforementioned appeal, the present appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
[TA-101-2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
112
ITA-101-2019 (O&M)Date of Decision : 6.9.2019
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Gurgaon
.-- Appellant
Versus
M/s. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., Delhi Road, Hisar
eee RESpOndent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present :Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Standing Counsel for the appellant.
999
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
1]The present appeal has been filed under Section 260A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’), against the order dated18.5.2018, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench“Friday” New Delhi, in stay application No. 407/DEL/2018 (in ITA No.1417/Del/2016) dated 18.5.2018 for the A.Y. 2011-12.
2It was not disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue that the matter in issue is no longerres integraand standsconcluded by the decision of this Court in ITA No.5 of 2016>titled as
éPr. Commissioner_of Income Tax, Gurgaon Vs. M/s Carrier AirConditioning and Refigeration Ltd.%, decided on 25.04.2016, whereby,identical question as claimed in the present appeal, has been held not tobe substantial question of law.
[TA-101-2019
3.
For the reasons recorded in the aforementioned appeal, the
present appeal is dismissed.
4Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending CM, if
any, also stands disposed of,
(AJAY TEWARTD)JUDGE
6.9.2019anuradha
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/NoWhether reportable:Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.