Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Pu...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Pune v. Ashok Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Shrirampur Dist - Ahmednagar

High Court 17 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

17 Jul 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Pune v. Ashok Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Shrirampur Dist - Ahmednagar, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

901 ITA NO. 46 OF 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 46 OF 2018 The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, PuneVERSUS Ashok Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Shrirampur Dist - Ahmednagar … Ms. Bharaswadkar Patil Kalpalata, Advocate for Appellant…Ms. Bharaswadkar Patil Kalpalata, Advocate for Appellant… CORAM: MANISH PITALE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE: 17.07.2025 PER COURT : 1.The learned counsel for the appellant (Revenue) has receivedwritten instructions to withdraw the appeal, as the tax effect involvedis less than Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Two Crore Rupees). 2.The Written instructions are taken on record. 3.In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 4.Pending Applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 5.The Court fees shall be refunded as per rules. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.