The Pr. .Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Economicexplosives Limited
High Court
07 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Pr. .Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Economicexplosives Limited
Date of order
07 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Pr. .Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Economicexplosives Limited, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: All above-referred Appeals are allowed to bewithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 59/2017
(The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. M/s EconomicExplosives Limited )
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.134/2017
(The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. M/s Rajaram Steels
Pvt.Ltd.) WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.47/2018
(The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. Mrs.Saroj Rander
Nagpur )WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.48/2018
(The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. M/s Ramesh Bhagirath
Rander (HUF) WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 50/2018
(The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. Ramesh Bhagirath
Rander (HUF) WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 76/2018
(The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. M/s Gupta IndustriesPvt.Ltd. Company)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofof directions and Registrar's orders
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
...............................................................................................................................................
Mr. S.N. Bhattad, Adv. for appellant Mr.Anand Parchure, Adv.for appellant in (ITL 134/2017)Mr.Anand Parchure, Adv.for appellant in (ITL 134/2017)
CORAM:P.N. DESHMUKH &
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 7[th] December, 2018.
Heard.
Perused the pursis filed for leave to withdraw the above-referredAppeals, contending that same is required to be withdrawn, in view of
sahare
the directions issued by the Department vide its Circular No.03/18 dated11.7.2018 as the subject-matter in the Appeals is below Rs. 50 lakhs.
Considering the contents in the Pursis as aforesaid, leave asprayed, is allowed. All above-referred Appeals are allowed to bewithdrawn. The appellants be refunded back the court fees as perRules.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.