Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. .Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nag...

The Pr. .Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Economicexplosives Limited

High Court 07 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Pr. .Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Economicexplosives Limited
Date of order
07 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Pr. .Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Economicexplosives Limited, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: All above-referred Appeals are allowed to bewithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 59/2017 (The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. M/s EconomicExplosives Limited ) WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.134/2017 (The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. M/s Rajaram Steels Pvt.Ltd.) WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.47/2018 (The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. Mrs.Saroj Rander Nagpur )WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.48/2018 (The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. M/s Ramesh Bhagirath Rander (HUF) WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 50/2018 (The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. Ramesh Bhagirath Rander (HUF) WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 76/2018 (The Pr. .Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur vs. M/s Gupta IndustriesPvt.Ltd. Company) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofof directions and Registrar's orders Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order ............................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.N. Bhattad, Adv. for appellant Mr.Anand Parchure, Adv.for appellant in (ITL 134/2017)Mr.Anand Parchure, Adv.for appellant in (ITL 134/2017) CORAM:P.N. DESHMUKH & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 7[th] December, 2018. Heard. Perused the pursis filed for leave to withdraw the above-referredAppeals, contending that same is required to be withdrawn, in view of sahare the directions issued by the Department vide its Circular No.03/18 dated11.7.2018 as the subject-matter in the Appeals is below Rs. 50 lakhs. Considering the contents in the Pursis as aforesaid, leave asprayed, is allowed. All above-referred Appeals are allowed to bewithdrawn. The appellants be refunded back the court fees as perRules. JUDGE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan