In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Ajit Ramakant Phatarpekar, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAAPPELLATE SIDE
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 708 OF 2016
INTAX APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2016
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI.,
Versus
AJIT RAMAKANT PHATARPEKAR.,
... Applicant.
... Respondent
None present.
REGISTRAR'S ORDER
Application to bring legal heirs on record of the deceased respondentis hereby granted for the reasons stated in the application and for thereason that the application is moved within time of 90 days.
MCA disposed of.
Date: 22nd September, 2016( P. M. Shinde )Deputy Registrar
msr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.