Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pana...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Ajit Ramakant Phatarpekar

High Court 22 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Ajit Ramakant Phatarpekar
Date of order
22 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Ajit Ramakant Phatarpekar, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAAPPELLATE SIDE MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 708 OF 2016 INTAX APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2016 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., Versus AJIT RAMAKANT PHATARPEKAR., ... Applicant. ... Respondent None present. REGISTRAR'S ORDER Application to bring legal heirs on record of the deceased respondentis hereby granted for the reasons stated in the application and for thereason that the application is moved within time of 90 days. MCA disposed of. Date: 22nd September, 2016( P. M. Shinde )Deputy Registrar msr
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan