Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Pati...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Patiala v. M/S Ambey Developer Pvt. Ltd

High Court 20 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

20 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Patiala v. M/S Ambey Developer Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Gurbax SinghIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARY ANA doe no40-4¢62017.08.03 13:16 CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 271 of 2016 (O&M).Date of decision: 20.7.2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Patiala ……Appellant Vs. M/s Ambey Developer Pvt. Ltd. …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present: Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for the respondent. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. For orders, see ITA No. 263 of 2016 (The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala Vs. M/s Ambey Developer Private Limited.) (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge July 20, 2017 ‘gs’ (Amit Rawal) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.