The Pr . Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Patiala v. Punjab State Electricity Board The Mall Patiala
High Court
10 Feb 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Pr . Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Patiala v. Punjab State Electricity Board The Mall Patiala
Date of order
10 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr . Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Patiala v. Punjab State Electricity Board The Mall Patiala, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether speaking/ reasoned 2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
204IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
he fITA-457-2018 (O&M)DECIDED ON: FEBRUARY 10, 2020
THE PR . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PATIALA
VERSUS
APPELLANT
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THE MALL PATIALA
RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocatefor the appellant(s).for the appellant(s).
Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate with|
Mr. M.S. Kanda, Advocate
for the respondent.
AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral):
For orders see order of the even date passed in ITA No. 44 of
2018 titled asThe Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala vs. Punjab
State Electricity Board, The Mall, Patiala.
IAJAY TEWARI]JUDGE
FEBRUARY 10, 2020
sham
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned
2. Whether reportable
JIAVNEESH JHINGANJUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue