The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi v. Ajay Engicone Private Limited
High Court
07 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi v. Ajay Engicone Private Limited
Date of order
07 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi v. Ajay Engicone Private Limited, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI T.A. No. 09 of 2018
----
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi having its office at Central Revenue Building, P.O. - G.P.O., P.S. Chutia, District : Ranchi.
……
Appellant
Versus
Ajay Engicone Private Limited, C/O Vinay Kumar Jalan, 48, Cart Sarai Road, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District: Ranchi.
……Respondent
----
CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
----
For the Appellant : Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate
Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate
For the Respondent : ----
----
Order No. 04 : Dated 7[th] January, 2019Aniruddha Bose, C.J.
Learned counsel for the Income Tax authorities submits that the tax
effect of this appeal is below Rs.50 lacs.
Having regard to Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018, he has instruction not to press this appeal as this case does not come within the
ambit of any of the exceptions contained in the aforesaid circular as also the subsequent Circular dated 20[th] August, 2018.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Let the instruction letter be kept with records.
(Aniruddha Bose, C.J.)
(Ratnaker Bhengra, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.