Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Roht...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rohtak v. M/S Swadesh Engineering Industries

High Court 25 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

25 Jul 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rohtak v. M/S Swadesh Engineering Industries, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH IAI ITA-168-2018(0&M)Date of Decision: 25.07.2019 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak ...... Appellant Versus M/s Swadesh Engineering Industries ....... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present:Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Senior Standingcounsel for the appellant-revenue. Mr.Amandeep Singh Meho, Advocate and|Mr. Parveen Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate for the respondent. AJAY TEWARI, J (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted thatthe application for rectification of the order dated 04.08.2017 passed byIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short 'ITAT") is pendingbefore the Tribunal. In view of these circumstances, the present appeal isdisposed of at this stage.| (AJAY TEWARITJUDGE_ 25.07.2019pooja saini (HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/NoWhether reportable: Yes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.