In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Appearance, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated 01.03.2018 raising following substantial question of law for our consideration :- “Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal is justified in not upholding the order of the A.O.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 1087 of 2018
==========================================================
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersusSMT. GRACY KUTHUMKAL THOMAS PROP. OF M/S JINNY MARINE TRADERS
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MR BHATT, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 04/09/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1. Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of
the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated
01.03.2018 raising following substantial
question of law for our consideration :-
“Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal is justified in not upholding the order of the A.O.
Wherein the books of accounts were
rejected u/s.145(3) of the Act on the
ground that the assessee has not valued
either at the cost price or market price
as per AS-2 but valued at realizable price
assumed by the assessee lower than the sale price ?”
2. The Assessing Officer after rejecting the
book results of the assessee under Section
145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 made
certain additions which were subject matter
of appeal before the CIT (Appeal) who made
detailed examination of the materials on
record and granted partial relief to the
assessee. Both sides filed cross-appeals
before the Tribunal. Tribunal dismissed both
the appeals. The department has carried the
issue further before us.
3. We have perused the documents on record
produced by the assessee. Heard the learned
counsel for the Revenue. CIT (Appeals) and
the Tribunal minutely examined the materials
on record and concurrently held that part of
the additions made by the Assessing Officer
were not sustainable. No question of law
arises. Issues are purely facts based. Tax
Appeal is dismissed.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
K.K. SAIYED
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.