The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax … v. Dempo Industries Pvt. Ltd., …
High Court
30 Jun 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax … v. Dempo Industries Pvt. Ltd., …
Date of order
30 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax … v. Dempo Industries Pvt. Ltd., …, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Since the Circular of CBDT even bind the Revenue, the Appeal cannot be entertained and hence, the same is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Suzana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO.15 of 2024
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax … Petitioner
Versus
Dempo Industries Pvt. Ltd., … Respondent
. Ms Amira A. Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Petitioner
Mr Mihir Naniwadekar, Advocate (through V.C.) and Ms Pooja Naik, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE &
NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
: 30[th] JUNE, 2025.
DATED
P.C:
1.In the Appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the aggregate Tax-effect involved is Rs.1,81,14,640/- and since the said amount is below Rupees Two Crores, in light of the Circular No.5/2024 and 9/2024 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which has set out the monetary limit for filing Income Tax Appeals by the Department before the Appellate Tribunal, High Courts, as well as the Apex Court, the Appeal do not deserve consideration.
2.Ms Amira Razaq, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue do not dispute that the tax effect involved in the Appeal is below the threshold set out by the CBDT Circular. However, she would submit that the present Appeal is filed in terms of the decision of the Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru, directing that all matters involving DIN should be challenged before the jurisdictional High Courts.
With regard to the said submission, we are of the view that the Circular issued by the CBDT binds everyone and this also include the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax as according to us, the Circular issued by the CBDT fixing the threshold limit, has a statutory effect and reading of the said Circular along with Section 260A of the Income Tax would lead to an inference that Revenue can prefer an Appeal only if a case raises substantial question of law subject to monetary limit stipulated by CBDT. Since the Circular of CBDT even bind the Revenue, the Appeal cannot be entertained and hence, the same is dismissed.
NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.